2nd half of the 20th century in social memory 2500-OG-EN-SHTCSM

The aim of the course is to discuss the most important events in the social history of the second half of the 20th century in various countries, primarily taking into account the division of Europe by the Iron Curtain. Official history is dominated by great events related to politics and wars, while at the same time ordinary everyday life goes on, which does not function in official circulation, but is present in the social memory of individual societies and selected social groups. A comparison of events from official history and their image in social memory will be made based on cultural images and field research. The following detailed issues will be discussed:
- Social history in various theoretical perspectives,
- Halbwach’s idea of collective memory,
- Oral memory and its interdisciplinary connections,
- Znaniecki’s humanistic coefficient and the idea of social memory. Social memory as social fact in Durkheim’s understanding,
- Various ways to determine the most important historical events,
- People’s views on history,
- Nostalgia and its sociocultural dimensions,
- Social memory in popular culture,
- Nostalgic social media groups and magazines,
- Interview, survey, questionnaire and participant observation in social memory studies
- Examples of the images of the recent past in various countries

W cyklu 2024/25L:

Same as A.

Całkowity nakład pracy studenta

Contact hours with teacher: - participation in discussion seminar – 30 hrs - personal and e-mail consultation – 15 hrs - reading literature for classes - 15 hrs Self study hours: - preparing for test or writing an essay – 15 hrs Altogether: 75 hrs (3 ECTS)

Efekty uczenia się - wiedza

Student has basic knowledge of the main historical, social, religious and cultural facts of the chosen areas; has basic knowledge of the cultural situation of the chosen countries in the recent past has basic knowledge of the relationships between the chosen historical facts and their social perception;

Efekty uczenia się - umiejętności

Student is able to seek, analyze, value, select and make use of the information on social history on the basis of various sources and in various ways; is able to differentiate and value various types of sources; understands variuos values and perspectives of different social groups

Efekty uczenia się - kompetencje społeczne

Student is conscious of his/her knowledge and skills, understands the need of broadening his/her knowledge; is conscious of the historical-cultural heritage of the chosen territory and social groups and respects them

Metody dydaktyczne

lecturing methods: - conversational lecture - informative lecture exposing methods: - display/presentation query methods: - observation - classic problem-solving - situational

Rodzaj przedmiotu

przedmiot fakultatywny

Wymagania wstępne

Working knowledge of English.

Koordynatorzy przedmiotu

Michał Głuszkowski

Kryteria oceniania

Assesment methods: written test at the end of the classes or an essay, attendance.

Assesment criteria:
attendance 50%, written test (or essay) 50%

0%-54% = fail
55%-69% = 3
70%-74% = 3+
75%-84% = 4
85%-89% = 4+
90%-100% = 5
The test verifies the following competences: Student has basic knowledge of the main historical, social, religious and cultural facts of the chosen areas; Student has basic knowledge of the cultural situation of the chosen countries in the recent past; Student has basic knowledge of the relationships between the chosen historical facts and their social perception; Student is able to seek, analyze, value, select and make use of the information on social history on the basis of various sources and in various ways; Student is able to differentiate and value various types of sources; Student understands variuos values and perspectives of different social groups; Student is conscious of his/her knowledge and skills, understands the need of broadening his/her knowledge; Student is conscious of the historical-cultural heritage of the chosen territory and social groups and respects them

Praktyki zawodowe

N/A

Literatura

Güelman, Martín. 2013. Las potencialidades del enfoque biográfico en el análisis de los procesos de individuación, Revista Latinoamericana de Metodología de la Investigación Social Nº5, Año 3, Abril-Septiembre 2013, s. 56-68.
Halbwachs, Maurice. 1939. Individual consciousness and collective mind. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 44, No. 6 (May, 1939), s. 812–822. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2769413
Hamilton, Carrie. 2008. On Being a 'Good' Interviewer: Empathy, Ethics and the Politics of Oral History. Oral History, Vol. 36, No. 2, Connections (Autumn, 2008), s. 35–43. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40179990
Jones, Rebecca. 2004. Blended Voices: Crafting a Narrative from Oral History Interviews, The Oral History Review, 31:1, s. 23-42, doi: 10.1525/ohr.2004.31.1.23 https://www.jstor.org/stable/3675529
Kaźmierska, Kaja; Schütze, Fritz. 2013. Wykorzystanie autobiograficznego wywiadu narracyjnego w badaniach nad konstruowaniem obrazu przeszłości w biografii. Na przykładzie socjologicznego porównania narracji na temat życia w PRL i NRD. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 9/4, s. 122–139.
Kaźmierska, Kaja; Waniek, Katarzyna. 2020. Autobiograficzny wywiad narracyjny. Metoda – technika – analiza. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Kiesling, Scott. 2006. Hegemonic identity-making in narrative. W: De Fina, Anna; Schiffrin, Deborah; Bamberg, Michael (red.), Discourse and Identity (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 261–287 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584459.014
Lochead, Richard. 1976. Three Approaches to Oral History: The Journalistic, The Academic, and the Archival. Oral History Forum d'histoire orale 1 (1975-76), s. 5–12, http://www.oralhistoryforum.ca/index.php/ohf/article/view/283
Nora, Pierre. 1989. Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire. Representations (26), s. 7-24. doi:10.2307/2928520, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2928520
Portelli, Alessandro. 2006 (1979). What makes oral history different. W: Perks, Robert; Thomson, Allistair (red.), The Oral History Reader. New York: Routledge, s. 32–42.
Shopes, Linda. 2002. Making Sense of Oral History. History Matters: The U.S. Survey Course on the Web, http://historymatters.gmu.edu/mse/oral/
Shopes, Linda. 2011. Editing Oral History For Publication. Oral History Forum d’histoire orale 31 (2011), s. 1–24. http://www.oralhistoryforum.ca/index.php/ohf/article/view/385
Szpociński, Andrzej. 2008. Miejsca pamięci (lieux de mémoire). Teksty Drugie 4, s. 11–20.
Tajfel, Henri. 1974. Social-Identity-and-Intergroup-Behaviour. Social Science Information 13(2), s. 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847401300204
Thomson, Alistair. 2007. Four Paradigm Transformations in Oral History. The Oral History Review Vol. 34, No. 1 (Winter – Spring, 2007), s. 49-70. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4495417
Thomson, Alistair; Frisch, Michael; Hamilton, Paula. 1994. The Memory and History Debates: Some International Perspectives. Oral History, Vol. 22, No. 2, 25th Anniversary Issue (Autumn, 1994), s. 33-43. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40179363
Yow, Valerie R. 2005. Recording oral history. A guide for the humanities and social sciences. Walnut Creek-Lanham-New York-Toronto-Oxford: Altamira Press.
Znaniecki, Florian. 2008 [1934]. Metoda socjologii. Tłum. E. Hałas. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

W cyklu 2024/25L:

Same as A.

Uwagi

W cyklu 2024/25L:

None.

Więcej informacji

Dodatkowe informacje (np. o kalendarzu rejestracji, prowadzących zajęcia, lokalizacji i terminach zajęć) mogą być dostępne w serwisie USOSweb:

Strona przedmiotu 2500-OG-EN-SHTCSM w USOSweb