Migration Crisis and the European Law 1300-MC-EL-KPP
Current immigration crisis has put the respect for human rights in many European countries at stake. The ever growing social problems contribute, among others, to the rise of xenophobia. State security, public policy and public morality are used by some of the European states to impose new immigration restrictions and to justify introduction of new anti-terrorism legislation.
Therefore, within the framework of this course, a reference to global human rights challeng-es will be presented to outline differences between forced (e.g. asylum) and economic mi-gration. On that basis, a discussion will be held on possible steps which could be taken to manage migration in a safe environment while respecting the opinion of the European socie-ties.
It is expected that during the workshops students will discuss current political and social challenges in order to outline limits to a state sovereignty (and jurisdiction) regarding ad-mission of immigrants and refugees. Main immigration routes will also be highlighted to show a global phenomena of migration, including its scale and motives behind it.
The workshops will focus on the European approaches (of the EU’s and the EU neighbouring countries’) to migration crisis. Therefore, adequate universal as well as regional (the Coun-cil of Europe and the EU) legal regimes will be used to present legal and policy approaches to:
• the Calais-Dover crisis;
• a notion of safe countries;
• the rules regarding detention of asylum-seekers and irregular immigrants,
• the mechanisms of relocation and resettlement,
• the detriments to immigration (including visa requirements, non-arrival policy and carriers’ liability).
Finally, an interlink between limitations imposed on human rights of migrants and those of a citizen of a country. Therefore, a reference to administrative procedures and the rule of law will form an important part of the course.
Literature and legal regulations: recommended by the lecturer during the beginning of the course
Assessment: based upon the presence and active participation; marks are given on additional workload agreed with the lecturer
Całkowity nakład pracy studenta
Metody dydaktyczne
Metody dydaktyczne eksponujące
Metody dydaktyczne poszukujące
- oxfordzka
- giełda pomysłów
- referatu
- klasyczna metoda problemowa
- seminaryjna
- panelowa
- projektu
Metody dydaktyczne w kształceniu online
- gry i symulacje
- metody wymiany i dyskusji
- metody rozwijające refleksyjne myślenie
- metody służące prezentacji treści
Rodzaj przedmiotu
Wymagania wstępne
Koordynatorzy przedmiotu
Kryteria oceniania
Assessment: based upon the presence and active participation; marks are given on additional workload agreed with the lecturer
Praktyki zawodowe
not applicable
Literatura
S. Lavenex, Safe Third Countries: Extending the EU Asylum and Immigration Policies to Central and Eastern Europe, Budapest 1999;
K. Przybysławska, Niepożądani uchodźcy: granice ochrony i zasady wykluczenia w świetle prawa międzynarodowego, Warszawa 2009;
A. Baldaccinni, Exterritorial Border Controls in the EU: The Role of Frontex in Operations at Sea, w: B. Ryan, V. Mitsilegas (eds.), Extraterritorial Immigration Control: Legal Challenges, Leiden 2010;
E. Brouver, Exterritorial Migration Control and Human Rights: Preserving the Responsibility of the EU and Its Member States, w: B. Ryan, V. Mitsilegas (eds.), Extraterritorial Immigration Control: Legal Challenges, Leiden 2010;
F. Düvell, Paths into Irreguralarity: The Legal and Potical Construction of Irregular Migration, „European Journal of Migration and Law” 2011, Vol. 13, Issue 3;
F. Düvell, The Pathways in and out of Irregular Migration in the EU: A Comparative Analysis, „European Journal of Migration and Law” 2011, Vol. 13, Issue 3;
A. Hurwitz, The Collective Responsibility of States to Protect Refugges, 2011;
B. A. Vollmer. Policy Discourses on Irregular Migration in the EU – “Number Games” and “Political Games”, „European Journal of Migration and Law” 2011, Vol. 13, Issue 3.
E. Hamdan, The Principle of Non-Refoulement under the ECHR and the UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, 2016;
S. Peers, E. Roman, The EU, Turkey and the Refugee Crisis: What Could Possibly go Wrong?, „EU Law Analysis”, 5.02.2016;
S. Peers, The Final EU/Turkey Refugee Deal: A Legal Assessment, „EU Law Analysis”, 18.03.2016;
P. Sadowski, Prawne, polityczne i społeczne konsekwencje rozdźwięku między uzusem a definicjami zawartymi w tekstach prawnych dotyczących imigracji, „Ius Novum” 2016, nr 4.
S. Carrera, K. Lannoo, We’re in This Boat Together. Time for a Migration Union, „CEPS Policy Insights” 2018, No. 9.
S. Carrera et al., Report. Offshoring Asylum and Migration in Australia, Spain, Tunisia and the US. Lessons Learned and Feasibility for the EU;
A. Dandashly, The EU Response to Regime Change in the Wake of the Arab Revolt: Differential Implementation, w: T. Börzel, A. Dandashly, T. Risse (eds.), Responses to the “Arabellions”: The EU in Comparative Perspective, Oxon 2017;
W. Klaus, Karanie za pomoc – jak rządy zniechęcają organizacje społeczne wspierające migrantów i ich aktywistów do działania, „Trzeci Sektor” 2018, nr 4;
R. Mungianu, Frontex and Non-Refoulement. The International Responsibility of the EU, 2018;
P. Sadowski, A Safe Harbour or a Sinking Ship? On the Protection of Fundamental Rights of Asylum Seekers in Recent CJEU Judgments, „European Journal of Legal Studies” 2019, Vol. 11, No. 2;
A. G. Valdivia, The Externalization of European Borders: Morocco Becomes a Key EU Partner in Migration Control, 26.12.2018;
P. Sadowski, Wspólny Europejski System Azylowy – historia, stan obecny i perspektywy rozwoju, Toruń 2019.
Więcej informacji
Dodatkowe informacje (np. o kalendarzu rejestracji, prowadzących zajęcia, lokalizacji i terminach zajęć) mogą być dostępne w serwisie USOSweb: