Challenges to Peace in the Contemporary World 2751-KONJA-CPCW
The first session will be dedicated to organizational matters: the teacher will discuss the principles of conducting the course, the organization of the debates to be held, and the assessment criteria.
Subsequent sessions will focus on various aspects related to contemporary challenges to peace. Topics will be proposed by the students themselves. Each topic will be discussed in the form of an Oxford-style debate, in which two four-person teams will be assigned in advance to criticize or defend a previously established thesis. The debates will consist of exchanges between participants (5 minutes for each participant's presentation, followed by a maximum 15-minute series of polemics). This will be followed by a series of questions from the audience, composed of other participants. The entire session will conclude with a joint discussion on the evaluation of the debate itself, the arguments used, and possible alternatives not explored by the participants.
Unlike the classic Oxford-style debate, the debate will not be assessed using an extensive scoring system designed to determine a winner. The primary goal of the classes is to teach each other how to construct arguments, conduct a substantive conversation, as well as develop language skills and learn specialized vocabulary.
Total student workload
Learning outcomes - knowledge
Learning outcomes - skills
Learning outcomes - social competencies
Teaching methods
Expository teaching methods
- problem-based lecture
Exploratory teaching methods
- Oxford
Type of course
Prerequisites
Course coordinators
Assessment criteria
In order to pass, the student needs to participate in at least two debates organized throughout the semester.
The criteria for improving thr grade are the following:
- preparing an original debate proposal (regardless of whether it will be used during classes): 2 points
- participating in the class as an audience member (questions for debaters, participation in debriefing discussions): 0.5 points per activity, max. 2 points
- outstanding participation in debates: 0.5-1 point per debate, max. 2 points
Final grade based on points earned:
3.0- 0 points (after meeting the requirement for passing the course)
3.5 - 1 point
4.0 - 2 points
4.5 - 3 points
5.0 - 4 points
Practical placement
-
Bibliography
Bradley G., Whitehouse D. (2012). Challenges to Peace in the 21st Century: Working towards a Good Information and Communication Society, Conference Paper in IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology · September 2012, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33332-3_25.
Bar-Tal, D. (2011). Challenges for constructing peace culture and peace education. In E. Matthews, D. Newman, & M. Dajani (Eds.), The Israeli-Palestinian conflict: Parallel discourses (pp. 209-223). London: Rutledge.
Reychler L. (2006). International Journal of Peace Studies, Volume 11, Number 1, Spring/Summer 2006, Challenges of Peace Research.
Simons C., Zanker, F. (2012), Finding the Cases that Fit: Methodological Challenges in Peace Research, GIGA Working Papers, No. 189.
Oxford-style debate. Training for Judges, Arizona Board of Regents, https://azregents.edu/sites/default/files/2024-01/Oxford_2022.pdf
Moszoro M., Oxford-style Debate, http://www.moszoro.net/docs/Oxford_debate_guidelines.pdf
Oxford Style Debate, United States Courts, https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/oxford-style-debate
Additional information
Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system: