Elective Course:Evaluating and monitoring analytical quality in laboratory medicine 1730-A-ZF-EVALUATING
Clinicians and patients expect laboratory results to be equivalent, independent of the laboratory producing them and of employed measuring systems. To reach this goal, it is essential to implement a measurement standardization process based on metrological traceability of patient results to higher order references. To this regard, the main requirements are: a) the identification of an unbroken metrological traceability chain to implement the appropriate transfer of the measurement trueness to commercial calibrators and patient results, b) the estimate of measurement uncertainty budget, with definition of permissible limits for clinical application of measurements, and c) a postmarket surveillance surveying the suitability of in vitro diagnostics
(IVD) for clinical use and of laboratory performances in using them The definition and enforcement of reference measurement systems, based on the implementation of metrological traceability of patient results to higher order (reference) methods and/or materials, together with a clinically acceptable level of measurement uncertainty (MU), are fundamental requirements to produce accurate and equivalent laboratory results. Estimating and checking MU in medical laboratories is essential to understand its influence on measurement results and, ultimately, their clinical suitability.
Total student workload
Learning outcomes - knowledge
Learning outcomes - skills
Learning outcomes - social competencies
Teaching methods
Expository teaching methods
- informative (conventional) lecture
Exploratory teaching methods
Prerequisites
Course coordinators
Assessment criteria
The scope of material required for final credit includes the content presented during the seminars and included in the recommended literature.
The final pass is in the form of a one-way selection test (≥60%): W1-W3, U1, U2.
Extended observation (≥50%): K1, K2
The condition for taking the final written test is to obtain a positive assessment in the field of social competences.
Grades are awarded pursuant to the percentage of correct answers, according to the table below:
Percentage of correct answers
Grade
>92% 5 (excellent)
84-91% 4+ (very good)
76-83% 4 (good)
68-75% 3+ (satisfactory)
60-67% 3 (sufficient)
0-59% 2 (fail)
Practical placement
Not applicable
Additional information
Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system: